Bank regulation and systemic risk: cross country evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cross - Border Bank Flows and Systemic Risk
We examine the impact of cross-border bank flows on recipient countries’ systemic risk. Using data on bank flows from 26 source countries to 119 recipient countries, we find that bank flows are associated with improved financial stability (i.e. lower systemic risk) in the recipient country. The impact of bank flows is stronger in recipient countries with weak regulatory quality and fragile bank...
متن کاملCross-Country Empirical Studies of Systemic Bank Distress: A Survey
A rapidly growing empirical literature is studying the causes and consequences of bank fragility in contemporary economies. The paper reviews the two basic methodologies adopted in cross-country empirical studies, the signals approach and the multivariate probability model, and their application to study the determinants of banking crises. The use of these models to provide early warnings for c...
متن کاملBank lending and commercial property cycles: some cross-country evidence
BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. Abstract Motivated by the frequently observed link between commercial property price volatility and b...
متن کاملManagerial Overconfidence and Bank Risk Taking: A Cross-Country Analysis
This paper examines the effects of managerial overconfidence on bank risk taking and investigates whether improvements in governance can help to mitigate the adverse effects of managerial overconfidence on bank risk taking by using ordinary least squares method. The sample consists of the financial institutions in G20 and Taiwan over the period of 2005-2012. The executive overconfidence is meas...
متن کاملSystemic Funding Liquidity Risk and Bank Failures
We examine the roles of idiosyncratic and systemic funding liquidity risks in bank failures. We estimate a discrete-time hazard model of bank failure using data of U.S. commercial banks between 1985 and 2004, and examine its out-of-sample forecasting performance between 2005 and 2011. The out-of-sample performance comparison shows this model outperforms typical bank failure prediction models. W...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0924-865X,1573-7179
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-020-00947-0